Imagine that you loan someone $10,000 with the understanding that they will pay you back on a monthly basis with interest. After a while, they fall behind on their payments, so you call them to discuss their financial status and encourage them to make a payment. But they dodge all phone contact and you’re not sure they are even getting your messages. No return phone calls. No contact. Nothing. Then you receive a letter in the mail that says something like this: “Pursuant to my consumer rights under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, I hereby demand that you cease and desist from any further attempt to contact me by telephone. Any further attempts at telephone contact will result in my taking legal action against you for violating my rights under Federal law.”
What would you do in this situation?
1. Meekly go away and make no further attempt to collect?
2. Ignore the demand and continue calling anyway?
3. Turn it over to a collection attorney?
The smartest thing to do in this situation would be to file a lawsuit against the debtor. When you look at it this way, it seems obvious that sending a cease communication notice to a creditor is a pretty dumb thing to do. It makes no sense at all if your goal is to work out mutually agreeable settlement arrangements with your creditors. Yet there are hundreds of debt settlement companies out there still using this obsolete and dangerous technique, not to mention countless debt information websites that recommend this approach and even provide sample letters.
When I first started doing debt negotiation in 1997, I worked hard to get the creditor to substitute my phone number for that of the client, so cease communication notices were rarely necessary because the creditor could contact me for an update any time they wanted to. I would only use cease communication notices with truly abusive creditors, the ones who refused to respect the rules and continued to harass or abuse the client even though they had received my power-of-attorney to speak on the client’s behalf.
Fast forward a few years. In the process of developing the operational procedures for a large debt settlement operation that handled thousands of clients, it became obvious that we would need an army of people just to field the auto-dialed calls from the creditors. Instead of this unworkable solution, we made the decision to coach consumers on how to screen the calls, report abuse, and generally tough out the collection process until we could negotiate realistic settlements on their behalf. This worked fine, and cease communication notices were usually unnecessary. Unfortunately, many other companies took the easy way out and simply sent out “C & D” letters to every creditor in the client’s file. This was done automatically, and without any analysis with respect to the frequency of the calls to the client or the nature of those calls. The result? A bunch of really angry creditors, a big increase in lawsuit activity (what other choice was the creditor given?), and a lot of unhappy clients.
Sadly, years later many companies and websites are STILL using or recommending this technique. Type “cease communication notice” into your favorite search engine and be amazed. I just did it and turned up more than 1.5 million hits!
Sending a letter like this is the exact OPPOSITE of the approach that I teach. What works best is communication in good faith. This is simply a matter of common sense. I’m not saying that you should subject yourself to abuse or harassment. But in that type of situation, a complaint letter is often more effective than a cease communication request anyway. Obviously, you also need to take measures to manage the volume of collection calls, which is simply a matter of screening. But it’s important to keep your creditors informed, let them know you haven’t disappeared or tried to skip out on your obligation, and that your intentions are to work things out when you have the resources to do so. Patient persistent explanation of your situation will win the day in the end.
It’s pretty simple, really. If you want to settle with your creditors, talk to them once or twice per month until you work out a deal. If you want to get sued, send a cease communication notice.
Mr Brownstone says
The purpose of a cease communication letter is to stop those that are not willing
to work out terms or negotiate with respect to the debt. Often times, a credit
card debt is only $150..but with fees, they quickly escalate it to $900 or even
$1000!!! Obviously, collectors are supposed to negotiate terms and collect,
however, some companies like I.C. Systems, BCR (bureau of collection recovery) and
others insist on abusive tactics.
Funny short story. I had BCR call me 28 days straight to collect on a debt.
Why is that funny? Because I wasn’t the person they were trying to reach, yet
they refused to stop calling me, AND, refused to update their records.
Cease communication is an equalizer for those companies that don’t want to
settle. They can always write you with an offer. Your cease letter may be
directly to telephone calls.
They’ve worked great for me and my clients, most of the time, it gets the lousy
collector back to negotiating….because they are limited to paper unless my
client calls them. This type of ‘turn of the table’ forces them to either
revert to the original creditor or start bargainging. Getting sued, although
a threat, just doesn’t happen. The person on the phone actually needs a retainer
on file…and they never have that authority.
Charles says
Regarding the above comment by Mr. Brownstone, I want to clarify
the difference between dealing with an original creditor (OC) versus
a third-party collection agency (CA). In my post above on the subject of
cease communication notices, I’m mainly referring to OCs. It’s simply
deadly to send a cease communication notice to an OC. With several
of the major credit card banks, receipt of a cease communication notice
translates immediately into the account being placed with a local collection
attorney, who IS authorized to file a lawsuit. I’ve seen this time and
time again.
When you are dealing with CAs, it’s a different story. Even there, however,
I recommend against use of cease communication notices unless absolutely
necessary. As I noted in the original post, “I’m not saying that you
should subject yourself to abuse or harassment.” If a collector has crossed
the line of allowable behavior, then the cease communication
notice is an appropriate response.
What I object to strongly is the blanket use of cease communication
notices by the debt settlement industry. It is a technique that has
been overused for many years, and there is a clear pattern of increased
litigation when this technique is applied to original creditors. It should
not be automatically used with collection agencies either, but reserved
for situations where it makes sense to bring a collector in-line who
is using harassing or abusive techniques.
Really, if you want to settle your debts, sending a letter telling
the creditor/collector to not call you anymore is the wrong approach.
Just get on the phone and haggle your way to a deal!
Harel says
I have no debt of any kind, zero.. (no credit card debt, no longer any student
loans, my car is paid off, and no mortgage) yet this year I’ve received
a huge number of phonecalls, mostly from BCR, all of them either
not giving a name, or giving the name of someone other than myself. I get a good half dozen such per week, every single week, and if you add the blank messages
which are probably mostly those, probably over a dozen a week, if not much higher.
The above by Mr. Brownstone about BCR refusing to update their records is exactly what I feared that a google search would turn up in terms of BCR’s behavior.
Here is my question: does the law allow me to send a cease and desist
letter to BCR, even though I don’t owe a debt to anyone (much less to them)?
Or does the law only apply to someone who DOES owe a debt?
If the latter, then what option do you have when you dont’ owe any debt but keep getting those calls?
Thanks